达里奥·阿莫迪: “我认为，如果把 Anthropic 过去一年里那些有利于安全、却让我们在商业上付出代价的事情列一张清单，它们会远远超过你列出的清单……我们早在 2 月就有了 Mythos 级别的模型，但直到 6 月（当我们部署了更强的网络安全防护措施时）才全面开放。……直接把模型发布给所有人，在经济上要合理得多。我们很可能牺牲了数月模型领先优势中的相当一部分。”

由 AI 翻译，经编辑部审校

原文

“I believe that if we take a list of things that Anthropic did in the past year that were pro-safety and commercially costly to us, they far outweigh the list you’ve made, while at the same time I also disagree with some of the items on your list. Here are some things Anthropic has done, in the same period you’ve cited (the last year), which were very costly to us commercially while having strong safety benefits: [...] 3. Similarly, we first had Mythos-class models in February but didn’t make them generally available until June (when we had stronger cyber safeguards in place). We only offered them to a limited set of partners in order to focus on cyberdefense. It would have been much more economically rational to simply release the model to everyone. We likely sacrificed a significant chunk of a several-month model lead. But because of this, many companies secured their cyber infrastructure before the deluge of widely available cyber-capable models. Of course there are ways it could have gone better or been run better, but this was what we were aiming to do.”

— 达里奥·阿莫迪, X, 21.10.2026 ↗

译文

“我认为，如果把 Anthropic 过去一年里那些有利于安全、却让我们在商业上付出代价的事情列一张清单，它们会远远超过你列出的清单；同时，我也不同意你清单上的某些条目。以下是 Anthropic 在你所说的同一时期（过去一年）里做过的一些事，它们让我们在商业上付出了很大代价，同时带来了显著的安全收益： [...] 3. 同样，我们早在 2 月就有了 Mythos 级别的模型，但直到 6 月（当我们部署了更强的网络安全防护措施时）才全面开放。我们只把它们提供给有限的一批合作伙伴，以便专注于网络防御。直接把模型发布给所有人，在经济上要合理得多。我们很可能牺牲了数月模型领先优势中的相当一部分。但正因如此，许多公司在具备网络攻击能力的模型大量普及之前，就加固了自己的网络基础设施。当然，有些地方本可以进展得更好、执行得更好，但这正是我们努力想要做到的。”